Spot on. The Democrats' insane starting premise is they can create legislation that will alter reality to fit their fantasies. I love this "everything is everything" concept because it describes perfectly why they screw things up so badly all the time.
There is no such thing as AI. There are a range of machine learning tools. The Leftist urge for totalitarian control drives them to absurdities like trying to regulate how people who know more than they do write code a liberal arts major cannot understand, all to defend against some imaginary existential and - I'll bet - intersectional whiny nonsense that has never occurred and will never occur.
I cannot tell you how wonderful and free America under 12 years of GOP governance is going to be.
Really feels like it depends on which of the republican ai narratives trump goes with.
Though, I feel like some of this over index’s on the political leaders of democrats on AI rather than what was happening in the full picture. I don’t have enough data to say definitively how. It is an issue, but makes all of it just look like a total failure.
I do think lots of positive stuff was (is) happening--just that things like the RMF are really not suited to be long-term governance documents. When a document lays out everything one *could* do, and then that document becomes de facto mandatory (as is quickly happening with the RMF), it creates opportunities for all kinds of nasty litigation. This is basically what happened with NEPA.
Also agree the state policy problems probably become worse on net under Trump, simply because many states will feel like "we have to take action because Donald Trump won't." Preemption becomes more important now.
Spot on. The Democrats' insane starting premise is they can create legislation that will alter reality to fit their fantasies. I love this "everything is everything" concept because it describes perfectly why they screw things up so badly all the time.
There is no such thing as AI. There are a range of machine learning tools. The Leftist urge for totalitarian control drives them to absurdities like trying to regulate how people who know more than they do write code a liberal arts major cannot understand, all to defend against some imaginary existential and - I'll bet - intersectional whiny nonsense that has never occurred and will never occur.
I cannot tell you how wonderful and free America under 12 years of GOP governance is going to be.
Really feels like it depends on which of the republican ai narratives trump goes with.
Though, I feel like some of this over index’s on the political leaders of democrats on AI rather than what was happening in the full picture. I don’t have enough data to say definitively how. It is an issue, but makes all of it just look like a total failure.
Worried that gutting the entire start will just open the door for more state legislation, while ai govt ecosystem reboots.
I do think lots of positive stuff was (is) happening--just that things like the RMF are really not suited to be long-term governance documents. When a document lays out everything one *could* do, and then that document becomes de facto mandatory (as is quickly happening with the RMF), it creates opportunities for all kinds of nasty litigation. This is basically what happened with NEPA.
Also agree the state policy problems probably become worse on net under Trump, simply because many states will feel like "we have to take action because Donald Trump won't." Preemption becomes more important now.
AI safety under the Republican government.
In 3 words: not so important.